Although the scene is hot given the setting and the girls, a more passionate approach rather than the usual grinning would have made for heightened eroticism. Some real deep kissing and more prolonged cunnilingus before the fingers made their dreaded appearance would have helped make the scene memorable, too.
Wednesday, April 19th, 2017 on Horizont II
A hot girl, a fairly hot interracial scene ...But what is it with the porn copycat stockings , garter belt obsession? Women with flaws or who are not slutty will dress like that sometime to entice their partner or "save the sex in our marriage". Women at the bunny ranch may parade wearing these things, Also more close ups and more varied positions were needed.
Wednesday, April 19th, 2017 on White and Black
It is such a shame and such a waste to have two pretty girls without guidance when it comes to the sex. Before we get to that, there is also a lack of consistency in the visuals. The director seem to finally "get it" as to the beauty of the thong sandals (another one of current porn's missed opportunities" . The camera focused on the girls feet for a moment . Maybe the sandal thing won't be neglected, we thought. Alas , it wasn't meant to be.
With a lack of consistency and subtlety, the girls are so businesslike they have already removed their sandals when we get to the start of the sex portion! As to the sex, Mr. Andre, I am beginning to wonder; I know it must be wonderful to see the Director Title and Name on the credits, but directors are supposed to well, direct. The scene starts hot enough but then the blonde goes to the usual use of the fingers and it all goes downhill from there. A few licks, lots of gingering and then the other does the same thing, a few licks and fingering.
I beg you , Mr. Director, please explain to the performers that we watch two girls together to kiss and lick each other . Is that too much to ask as to insstruction for the performers?
Tuesday, April 18th, 2017 on Like Waves
The girls look hot could have been a memorable classic. Unfortunately, the usual excessive fingering and lack of deep kissing destroy the scene chances of being outstanding. Mr. Director, why can we get the basics, kissing and licking, at the very least?
Tuesday, April 18th, 2017 on Fight For Love
Marginal (to be generous) video as far as the sex action. See my comprehensive post. I love sandals staying, yes.
Thursday, January 5th, 2017 on Sunset
Every porn producer can eventually become stuck at minimiaist offerings that lack in very important areas of production values -if the fan (assuming the producer is willing to listen) will just provide gushing , easily amused praise , instead of exercising the burden to point out those grave shortcomings. As a "refugee" from USA lesbian porn videos, I keep looking for that extra quality and (I dream) drama-misssing in both lack of drama and lack of production values.
I signed up to Sex Art this time after looking at the preview for this video. When I read the comments below :MonCapitan 3 days ago
"I fucking hatevthis video. They never get nude by keeping their sandals on. It completely turns me off the entire film. It is a waste of 20 minutes. Andrej Lupin should be fired over this horrible effort. This film is a waste of bandwidth, server space, and time. I want the twenty minutes of my life lost to this shit back." on quote, I thought, what a narrow minded viewer, to discard a whole video over the girls keeping the sandals on..... ".... Wow!
Funny because I came to agree with the essence of the criticism of the video, even though I love the Sandals! One of the areas porn (or erotica , for the squeamish) is (as it often does) letting the boat sail away, is in the area of flat , open , thong sandals. The girls look amazing with those sandals . The eroticism is boundless. Yet most porn producers just don't get it.
The director of this video got it ! Hurray! Unfortunately that is the only thing he got. Artistic or erotic does not mean lack of explicit essential action or camera variety and sufficient close up angles and close views even of the full body shots. Why this video was filmed in a reduced, letter box frame is beyond me. The problem is that the director never compensates, as it it was too much work to move the stationary camera to get more varied shots for a ridiculously low total of 19 minutes of viewing?
Art does not have to be without dialogue. Why can you have the girls talk, even if you use subtitles? Secondly, set up the action, move them around, give a reason for the sex. As to the sex itself, if we get beyond how great visually the girls look and they way they are dressed and of those almost effortless (in terms of director involvement) factors, what do we have for 19 minutes? Practically zero kissing, a quick passing licks by one of the girls and then virtually a fingering festival (a la, those cheap GF videos and its US offspring!). At some point, in the counterpoint round (the second ) of fingering, the girl quickly starts moaning! She came? No, time to wrap it up
I hope this is not a harbinger of what to expect from this director. A great porn historian once repeated the forgotten maxim that a sex film cannot forget it is about sex. I would add to that that a lesbian porn (or erotica, again) video cannot forget that the essential parts of lesbian porn action are licking of sexual parts, niblbing and sucking said parts and (with some luck , it seems these days) some good samples of deep passionate kissing.
I have to wholeheartedly agree with MonCapitan, even as I loved the sandals staying, sorry, they are nude even though wearing sandals, LOL. I may not agree with the words the poster used or the recommendation for the director but yes :
"This film is a waste of bandwidth, server space, and time." ...And that is not to mention we are paying to see two beautiful girls have sex! Occasional fingering is hardly a full sexual lesbian porn act. I hope my humble criticism is at least considered.
Hi, thanks for your feedback. We do take note of members' comments. You might like to watch a few more of this director's movies before making a judgement, as many do contain dialogue between the performers, passionate kissing, storylines and many of the other things you have mentioned.
Regarding the aspect ratio, this is from Jon, the owner of the site: "The reason we shoot in 2.35:1 anamorphic/Cinemascope is completely based on our love for film. Furthermore, we are trying to give the audience a complete movie-going experience because this aesthetic is associated with higher end feature films. It is considered the most cinematic or filmic aspect ratio filmmakers use in their storytelling toolbox. It is my belief it's the best aspect ratio for dramatic narrative filmmaking, and it is why we use it here at Sexart.com. This is not to say that 2.35:1 is always the most appropriate aspect ratio to shoot in. I think TV and Documentaries should be filmed in 16:9 because that aspect ratio lends itself to a better viewing experience."
Friday, January 6th, 2017 on Sunset
18 U.S.C. 2257 Record-Keeping Requirements Compliance Statement. All materials © 2017 SEXART.com. All models photographed were at least 18 years old.