I'm afraid I have to agree with the "underwhelmed" comments. Not completely sure why. Marica has an impish face, but I'm just not feeling much chemistry with the camera (and me). Part of it was that it took over 30 shots before she took off anything. But I'd give her another chance I think.
I was sufficiently intrigued at how a model who in this one looked generally awkward and disengaged has so many sets on MetArt. So I looked at a set on Eternal, where I found everything to be sooo much better. Perhaps this was one of those that SA's quality control should have vetoed...
Here I go again being a little long winded. Marica has done four sets here. Two of the them were shot by Antares and Two by Vincent Silva. Both of Vincent's were rated in the "8"s both of Antares in the "7"s. Her last set "High Heeled" got a decent rating and a good number of positive comments. She personally has a 9.09 rating Which means she out ranks her sets presented. IMO one of the factors is that in general on all four sets the Met Art limit is only slightly breached. Not to normal Sex Art style or limit. I noticed that she has no problems with touching herself and spreading her self open but seems to avoid ANY penetration. She has a good rating on Met where she has primarily worked with Arkisi and her sets here pretty well mirror what she has done there except for more touching here. I doubt we have seen her "best" here yet so give her a break lets see if she can get comfortable enough with an artist to give us more, where she will do justice to here Urkrainian heritage.
I agree. Deeply underwhelming. Partly because of the shabby, uninteresting but intrusive backdrop of what looks almost like a storage area in a 3 star hotel.
But also because, frankly, Marica is not a particularly attractive, let alone erotically convincing, model.
Not great, in fact not even good.
18 U.S.C. 2257 Record-Keeping Requirements Compliance Statement. All materials © 2017 SEXART.com. All models photographed were at least 18 years old.