Grace C as beautiful as ever. Do you have a fan club? I would love you to play with mine!
Tnis sums up to me why I think that the photos lag well behind the movies here. The set is perfectly decent of its type - well lit, everything in focus, pretty girl. However, there is no sexuality at all, she is just on display, and there is nothing adventurous in the photography. Maybe getting the involvement and intimacy that we see in the movies is more difficult with still photographs than we imagine, I don't know.
In this case the technical side is ok but the artistic/sexual part is lacking. As I wrote before I prefer the other way round: more attention to the "core" of the story, that is the model and the passion driving her in that moment. This set doesn't communicate anything to me, and although the lighting seems ok images are quite grainy and not totally sharp, and there is also a lot of repetition, maybe trying to imitate movie sequences but when you have 2 or 3 series of 5-6 images looking very similar on a total of 120 images that means that there is not enough variety and the set results boring. Grace deserves better.
its was my feeling of her at that time. next time I remember your opinion when I will do some sets:)
Grace is gorgeous as always. She's undoubtedly one of my favourites. Personally, I think whatever she does is going to be really beautiful, just because she's in it, however... That doesn't mean all her work meets the same standard. Whilst this is beautiful, I'm a little let down.
There were just far too many close-ups of Grace's privates and far too many photos without her face. Therefore I felt like I was interacting with her privates, rather than with her. There was just no connection. And well... That makes everything feel cheap. A girl is more than just her private parts. Grace deserves better.
Sorry. I know it's harsh. But it's how I feel.
hayley, I haven't seen this set (I have a very idiosyncratic method of what image sets I view when, but that's just me!), but I completely agree with what you say in general. My feeling is much in line with BatWWD that the image sets on SA lag behind the vids in quality, and I'd add they lag behind the photo sets on MA in quality. I think the biggest problem is along the lines of what you suggest, that because SA allows for explicit content (dildo/finger and pussy play), many photographers tend to lean on those as a crutch, as if saying "hey, we can show this here!"
Of course, MA doesn't allow for this explicitness, which I think provokes photographers to get more creative with the lighting, sets, poses, angles. I think on MA you tend to get more of a feeling of the personality of the models because you don't get all of these explicit shots, even though you do (usually) get some close ups of pussies and other body parts. So many SA photo sets just end up with endless explicit close-ups as if the photographer is doing a profile on the model's pussy rather than the model.
This isn't always the case, and I have come across several excellent photo sets on here that are explicit, but don't let the explicitness get in the way of the model's personality or forget that there's a face/person attached to the parts. Here's a good example I saw recently and rated an 8/10: http://members.sexart.com/members/model/milania-a/gallery/20120814/PRIVACY/ In that set I love how, eg, the first few dildo insertion, Marco goes to a close shot of Milania's face and hand as she clutches the bed spread, so you not only get a sense of the dildo going in, but you get a sense of what Milania felt. That's photography telling a story, rather than just ogling body parts. Plus, I think there's a great variety of angles and shots and good dynamics where, eg, a close-up might lead to a wide-shot.
Yes, well-said. I, too, like that Milania set, and part if it is the things you note. "...[P]hotography telling a story, rather than just ogling body parts."
My sentiments exactly. Grace (Anneli) is a great favorite and I always welcome anything with her. But, this set is very repetitive in the "private parts" shots. Somehow there has to be some other way to distinguish "MetArt" style photo shoots from "SexArt" shoots other than just lots of REPETITIVE gyno shots. And I would have preferred for Grace to take off her top somewhere before the end. There was one really great sot of her face when she was being penetrated with the dildo that was more in the vein of what I would like to see. That shot went into my "Grace" folder.
But: There cannot be too much Grace! So: more Grace, please.
Well said hayley. Some of the favorite shots for me are her looking into the camera. It's almost like her saying, 'wouldn't you like to be here with me'. Of coarse my answer is: Yes indeed!
18 U.S.C. 2257 Record-Keeping Requirements Compliance Statement. All materials © 2017 SEXART.com. All models photographed were at least 18 years old.