- Updates
- Films
- Photos
- Models
- Blog
- Live Girls
- Live Girls
- Models Online Now
-
AnielaXXXX
● Online
HD 20 
-
BadAngelGirl
● Online
HD 18
- All Online Models
- New Models
-
Anna_Meow
● Online
HD 19
-
RitaCandy
● Online
HD 19
- All New Models
- Models Nearby
-
EmberSnow
● Online
HD 21 
-
KELLY_ASTRID
● Online
HD 18
- All Models Nearby
- Gold Show
-
Hellen_Booty
● Gold Show
HD 20 
-
AliciaRedd
● Gold Show
HD 22 
- All Gold Show
- Party Chat
-
DianeSpace
● Party Chat
HD 18 
-
Summer_Angel
● Party Chat
HD 19 
- All Party Chat
- Join Now
More Information
19 Members commented on Eufrat Mai's movie
Anonymous One 5 years ago
Leyla's body paint is horrible. I hate to see Eufrat with such a model.
Blackhawk and The White Winged Dove 5 years ago
I'm afraid we didn't like this one at all. Eufrat is gorgeous as always, but Leyla? No. I don't like criticising individual models as they are brave enough to expose themselves to us, but in this case the issues are self inflicted so I don't feel so bad about it. Her tattoos are terrible. I know its a generation thing - my three daughters all have tattoos, and only the eldest is old enough for them to have stretched and faded - she now bitterly regrets them. Leyla's are particularly intrusive and unattractive. Her hair also, strongly bleached and flat, contrasts very badly with her eyebrows and pubes. It's not a good look. This and the somewhat pedestrian sex meant that we gave up after about 10 minutes - we've seen about 3/4 of the films on this site, and this is only the second one (after Upper West Side 2) we haven't reached the end of (although sometimes we've skipped a few minutes of the longer ones)
Kat_Vaughn 3 years agoContributing Writer
Omg! You took the words right out of my mouth. I could deal with the look, but seeing such a stellar performer like Eufrat with this girl really angered me. It's Eufrat! She is practically flawless. What was she scared her pussy was gonna bite her or something? Lol I couldn't watch the rest.
theukstrategist 5 years ago
Hi Eufrat,
Just saying hello
From me2u
sexfan 5 years ago
wow didn't realize tattoos are so taboo between this site and metart there are 4000 models and 90 percent don't have tattoos I for one think its about time they put a few tattood girls out here I think there is smoking beauty in a tattood woman
Snowfall1 5 years ago
Great film, great girls.
I don't object to tattoos, nor to piercings, nor do I want all models to display them in every set or film. And both tattoos and piercings can be overdone. But aren't they in similar territory to what the actor/models will or won't do on set? If the producers/directors want something (or don't want it) they will select accordingly.
And given the mixed opinions on so many strands of performance, performers, combinations (b/g, g/g), sets, length, etc. don't we all generally agree that SA people do their best to please most of us at least a reasonable amount of the time?
horsemaster 5 years ago
" don't we all generally agree that SA people do their best to please most of us at least a reasonable amount of the time?"
Indeed, yes. Good comment.
horsemaster 5 years ago
It's really hard to add much after Hayley13's awesome review. I find I am pretty much down the line with her detailed and thoughtful comments. In particular her notes on tats, the reflections from the glass wall, Eufrat's amazing JOY at all her sexual encounters. (In fact I would sum up this film with the word "Joy"). I did like the little afterward which is the prelude to the film, however. Great review, Hayley13.
A further note on the glass wall. I generally find the peek-a-boo panning around walls, curtains, pillars, etc. that is sometimes used (as here) distracting. In this case I gather that the glass wall is part of the architecture of the venue where this was shot. So Alis and Jorge chose not to shoot around it, but through it. For me the result is that during this extraordinarily beautiful interlude with two beautiful ladies, I find myself thinking about architecture and why on earth an interior designer would put a glass wall in front of a bed. And then I jerk from that musing back to the film proper and worry, "oh, what nuance did I just miss? Oooo, look at THAT!" And then it's back to the wall and I can see reflections in the glass and I wonder if I squint hard enough, can I actually make out Jorge and the camera. Then jerk back to the action. Yes, distracting. Not sure what to do when the darned glass is right there and there is a need to put two cameras to work. Interesting, but distracting.
Loved the film overall. Hot ladies involved in very realistic passion and lust.
harryben 5 years ago
A reassuring return to SexArt form after the last, problematic, film. Alis, I always look forward to your work, it has sensitivity, intrigue and sensuality. And how good to have Eufrat. I agree with hayley13, Eufrat has a singular commitment to the sexual side, which is always exciting. Leyla is a very welcome addition, too, although she sometimes appeared to be a bit tentative. But I really look forward to seeing her again.
hayley13. 5 years ago
Overall:
A solid effort Alis, this is a really nice film. It brings up lots of discussion points, so I hope you and the members don’t mind a bit of a read. I will separate this comment out, because I do have a couple of debatable opinions. Please feel free to ‘up’ or ‘down’ members, I don’t mind at all. It’s a good feedback system. So… Lets get started.
hayley13. 5 years ago
Good:
Acting:
I remember reading an interview with Christopher Nolan once, and he was asked, ‘what is the most important role of a director?’ And his immediate reply was, ‘selecting a good cast of actors’, followed by a variety of other things. It seems to be a huge talent of yours too Alis, because I really enjoy your castings. Now for a bit specific to the models:
Eufrat:
I want to start by saying… Eufrat is gorgeous. She is exactly the kind of model I want to see more of at SexArt; I hope the following anecdote explains why. Eufrat can act! Yet, I don’t believe she does, because I feel that she’s entirely genuine (I hope that makes sense). Eufrat is genuinely into the sex. You can tell (sorry if its rude) by how easily Leyla inserts her fingers into Eufrat’s pussy, and furthermore (sorry, this is probably ruder) by the juices that glisten off of Leyla’s fingers. I mentioned in a comment on ‘SexArt Blog – The Plot Thickens’, that what I was after most from SexArt were REAL girls who were genuinely into each other. Eufrat is one of those girls. I also want to mention how I adore that Eufrat doesn’t underestimate the value of silence. I personally dislike constant groaning and moaning, it never happens in my partners and mine, or any other of my friends and their partners sex life, that I talk to. I’m glad Eufrat reflects this here; it offers a very natural feeling to the film, a very SexArt feeling. The biggest point I want to bring up about Eufrat however is experience. It’s why all of the above just happens… so effortlessly. She knows how to make porn, better yet, she knows how to make SexArt and best of all, she knows how to convey love. And as a side note, I would love to see her with the girl I feel reflects all of this also, in a SexArt production… Miss Sylvie Deluxe.
Leyla:
Short and sweet for Leyla… but awesome acting. The thing that makes me say this most was her ‘orgasm,’ because it wasn’t overacted. Whether or not she actually ever achieved orgasm, I’m not sure, and I personally like that. It’s better than moaning and groaning out an overacted fake one, but that’s just my opinion. I also really liked earlier in this section, when Leyla was sitting over the top of Eufrat and masturbating. I cannot explain just how HOT I thought that was. It would have been even better with eye contact.
A Girl Enjoying Another Girls Body:
It’s a very defining element of lesbianism, and it was very much on display in this film. The girls always had their hands on each other’s faces, necks, boobs (especially Leyla on Eufrat’s), waist, hips, legs, etc. It very accurately conveys the softness, sensuality, adoration and love with which women make love to one another.
Girly Additions:
I am ‘cerebral’. I adore girly additions to films. For example, I don’t know if many other people cared in the film, but in Don’s masterpiece ‘Be Mine’ one of my favourite things (and its weird, because seeing a girl lick another girl’s pussy should be the main turn on) was Lorena’s nail polish. Alis, I loved the girly additions in this film (and your last film also, Bailey’s earrings). Leyla’s necklace, pink nail polish, ankle bracelet… They were all wonderful to see.
Music:
Again, wonderful Alis. I went and checked out Trace the Skyline’s 2008 EP after hearing ‘Missing Satisfaction’. I just love your music choices.
Photoset:
Perfect. Very accurately resembles what was seen in the video, as it should be. Please continue to do this Alis.
hayley13. 5 years ago
Bad:
Tattoos:
I really don’t want to be disrespectful and rude here, and I will try my best not to be, I apologize in advance if any feelings are hurt. I’ve always believed in very ‘natural’ beauty, and thus unfortunately for me, tattoos don’t’ work. Which sucks because a lot of my ‘Gen-Y’ cohort, especially those who are involved in porn, think they are awesome. I can grow ‘accustomed’ to some tattoos because of a girl’s pure and ultimate beauty (Sylvie) or because she is so charismatic (Jasmine, Malena, Elle) or because they are small and in some way artistic (Sylvie’s feather on her wrist), however, this is not the case here with Leyla. Don’t get me wrong, Leyla is gorgeous, but… I just can’t… I don’t find it attractive (I’m sorry). It’s just my opinion; please feel free to thumbs down if you disagree. But SexArt, personally, I would love to try and see the site stay relatively tattoo free, particularly if they are as off-putting as Leyla’s. (Again, im really sorry, despite my efforts not to be the above, I have been, but I really needed to voice this opinion).
Artifacts:
And by that Alis I refer to lines, glare, shadows etc., which were somehow, unintentionally I know (that’s why their artifacts) layered over the film. I’m not sure what the issue was (lighting, shot behind glass), you would know better than me, but if you could eliminate this from happening in future films it would be good.
Snowfall1 5 years ago
Great review, elements of which I don't necessarily agree with (eg. tattoos, length).
I'm sure I am not alone in saying you don't need to apologise (to us or to all of the SA people) for your opinions...
Milk2031 5 years ago
I agree, the tattoos ruiened it for me. Also it's not good when the carpet doesn't match the drapes... I enjoy natural beauty...
harryben 5 years ago
hailey13, It is absolutely clear that the 'artefacts' you refer to are meant to be there - you don'y work to the high standards of cinematography that SexArt achieves without knowing exactly what is in the frame and what it is there for. I am always intrigued by the layering of perception that is often used on this site - the slow tracking from side to side, often using a reveal from behind a wall or a drape - in this case a glass edge - is a hallmark, and I think it is a good way of suggesting that we both imagine and remember what we see as we see it. The lighting, again, is always carefully controlled - the degree of flare, the different levels of saturation, texture etc - these I am sure are intended. Some people might find them distracting, but they are part of the whole 'argument' about erotic short film that SexArt seems to be exploring.
hayley13. 5 years ago
Hi harryben, thank you for your insight. That is my mistake. However, i wouldn't have made the comment were it 'absolutely clear' to me that it was intentional. The rest of your comment i totally agree with. And i apologise for my mistake.
harryben 5 years ago
No, it's not a mistake - reading horsemaster's comments, he obviously finds a lot of this distracting, as do you, and that's the main point. For myself, sometimes these techniques work, and sometimes they get in the way. I have a particular interest in this side of things, as it was once my main job, so maybe I am not always looking at the films purely from the story point of view. I have just watched the latest film from idreamofjo - there is a wonderful example of beautiful, untricksy camerawork, which SexArt also often achieves. So I go with the majority on this - keep it simple !
hayley13. 5 years ago
Unsure:
Length:
I bring it up, because, previously I disagreed with Blackhawk and Dove regarding length. I actually really like the length of your films. The more the better, especially if it’s as top quality as your doing. But… on this film, I was unsure. Like the above-mentioned member has said previously on other films, in this film I did think that some parts maybe ‘dragged-out’ a little. My question is, do you say to your actors, ‘I need 30mins of film’ (in a nicer manner of course), or is it a natural thing where you ‘go-with-the-flow’ and film for as long as the girls are enjoying each other? I personally would prefer the latter, as its more natural, but I am unaware of how these films are made and things, so I would understand if that’s not the case.
Editing:
It was an interesting edit Alis, especially because you decided to put the beginning of the story at the end. Again, im unsure about this, I didn’t like it, but I also didn’t dislike it. It was a little confusing but, mostly because I expect it from Christopher Nolan film, not Alis Locanta, but hey… It works for him; maybe it could for you…
hayley13. 5 years ago
Thanks again Alis for a wonderful film. I loved the fact that it brang up so many talking points, and opinions. You continue to bring us something new and interesting and at times groundbreaking. I just love watching SexArt develop.