Okay, here is an idea for one of you adventurous stills photographers.
Although the name escapes me, there is a technique whereby the photographer rapidly shoots 3-4 shots of exactly the same pose but with the center of focus 1) just in front, 2) just midway through, and 3) just at the rear edge of the model. You pour in the light to maximize depth of field. Then one can capture every single millimeter of the model in perfect focus in high definition in one or the other of the shots. Then in Photoshop you can make a composite of the shots into a single image. Use a large format camera with ultra mega pixel resolution. You can end up with a single image with ultra-sharp focus throughout the frame.
Find the right model, and discuss what you want to do: capture the moment of truth in an orgasm. Work with her to masturbate and jointly work out a pose for the moment of climax where every part of her body is engaged in that climax. Let her work up to it, and, at the right moment, take that rapid series of varied focus shots. Create that single image.
Now crop from that single image a large series of closeups of all parts of the model's body: hands, feet, legs, torso, pussy, breasts, nipples, arms, hair, and especially her face, lips, mouth, ears, nose, and focus on her eyes. End the set with the glory of the entire image.
Title the set: "The Moment".
Marco, what do you think? And, if not you, then maybe Don Caravggio? Or Catherine?
Actually horsemaster you almost need a real studio to pull it off. The lighting is a total bitch during the process and the stillnes of the model critical. Thus to pull it off at the point of orgasm would be a real trick. I know Erro could do it, so could Ry. Your best bet right now would be DeltaGamma, he is developing well, his ego would demand he try it. If he pulled it off then he would have a "signature" set here. See what he says? I know he reads as many comments as he can and not just of his own work. If you don't get a quick reply then next time he posts, refer him back to this comment. I know he will answer you, even if he declines.
I do agree with swptf2. Marco seems to be trying to do something artistic with the black and white spotted back drop and the blue and magenta cylinder of strings and beads. This creates a very small space in which to work and, like often happens in small spaces in such shoots, puts major constraints on how Katya can move. There is a lot effort in trying to work both Katya's sexuality and the backdrop and cylinder into the shots and, like swptf2, I'm not sure it really works. A couple of the shots (including the cover shot) are quite artistic, but not particularly erotic, and the set as a whole does seem to lack that level of freedom that the best eroticism often requires. It's a nice exploration and experiment and I thank both Marco and Katya for giving it a try.
One small suggestion for all still sets: please try to include a few close-ups of the model's face and eyes. If she is really turned on, it will show in her eyes (wide pupils!). And flirty smiles always are nice.
I guess I am just being a bitch today,(Both here and on Met) but IMO while Katya is very beautiful what we get is a show of her body with zero eroticism. So far she has played with toys, even anal beads in the wrong hole, but without any attempt to exhibit what they or her finger play here today is/are for. i.e stimulation which might leads to orgasm. Today even she seems bored with the display. If I am missing something, enlighten me, my beloved boo birds. After just how good some of the sets and movies were last week this just seems like a let down.
I will say that photo 115 is absolutely stunning.
18 U.S.C. 2257 Record-Keeping Requirements Compliance StatementAll materials © 2014 sexart.com. Models photographed were at least 18 years old.This website is operated by Hydentra HLP Int Limited, Karpenisiou, 9, Strovolos, 2021, Nicosia, Cyprus